The following post is an observation and not a rant.
Someone recently posted this video over on the Judoforum and
I found myself watching it again and again. It then got me thinking about the
leg grab techniques which the IJF decided to ban from all competition in 2013. Back
in 2010 they banned leg-grabs as a direct attack which was largely attributed
to wanting to differentiate Judo from wrestling to safeguard its acceptance as
an Olympic sport. I can’t confirm that, but it’s the widely accepted
explanation. In 2013 they went one step further and not only disallowed
those techniques as direct attacks, but as follow-ups and counters as
well.
So leg attacks can still be taught in Judo but cannot be used in Competition. But, as most people need to compete to get their black belts, there is little point in spending time learning something that they cannot use, thus the next generation of Judo black belts are unlikely to be able to properly perform throws like Morote gari.
Now I’m sure most of these techniques are preserved in Kata
and with the BJA recently making Kata compulsory from 1st kyu
gradings upwards some could say that this will in effect ensure the next
generation are at least familiar with leg grabs. However there is no substitute
for using a technique against a fully resisting opponent in randori or shiai.
Its only then that you learn not only how to perform it correctly but also how
to properly defend against it.
A lot of the now “illegal” techniques which have been
removed from Judo over the years can still be found in other grappling arts
like BJJ and Sambo and it’s been said that to learn Judo, as was originally
taught by Kano, one has to turn to these other grappling arts.
The issue I and many other judoka have with the constant
rule changes is that they are watering down Judo’s effectiveness as a combat
sport and effective form of self-defence.
I would be embarrassed if I attended a BJJ class whilst they were
practicing takedowns and I was the one constantly being taken down with a
double leg (Morote gari) because I didn’t know how to sprawl. Or I didn’t know
how to defend when someone took a double lapel grip on my gi. You could argue
that the new rules makes Judo more exciting to watch with a higher percentage
of ippons but who actually watches Judo other than people that practice it? If
you do Judo you invariably like watching high level Judo whatever the rules. The lay person is never going to be excited
about watching Judo unless someone from their country is fighting for gold in
the Olympics.
Another problem with the rule changes is that it makes Judo
less effective in MMA. Some might ask why this is a problem, well I’ll tell
you. With Ronda Rousey being the current UFC Bantamweight champion Martial
Artists are seriously looking at Judo as a viable style to learn to help them
in the octagon. However Ronda’s Judo was pre 2010 and therefore included leg
grabs, which to be successful in MMA you have to know how to perform and defend
against as this determines where the fight takes place. In my limited BJJ
training the only time I ever did anything from standing was when we drilled
how to sprawl against a morote gari. Therefore if someone has intentions of
competing in MMA why would they choose Judo over BJJ when BJJ clearly has
enough of the wrestling based techniques most widely used in MMA already
incorporated in their training?
So what’s the answer? Local clubs could ignore the rule
changes and still teach Kano’s Judo but then, as I’ve mentioned already, this
will mean a lot of time is spent on techniques that their students cannot use
in competition. That’d be a bit like teaching someone how to kick in
preparation for a boxing match. Yes Kicking works in a real fight but you
cannot use it in the rules of boxing. In
the US they have taken the matter in to their own hands and created FreestyleJudo which in essence is Judo without all the recent IJF rules regarding leg grabs
& Gripping. In addition to the normal way shiai is scored, Freestyle Judo
also gives points for things like passing the guard and sweeps which is more
akin to BJJ rules but still scores Ippon for Osaekomi-waza. Now I like the idea
of this but there doesn’t appear to be a UK equivalent as yet. Freestyle Judo
is not a governing body they just have their own competitions which allow
Judoka from any org to enter using the Freestyle rules, so you can’t be graded
in this form of Judo and neither are any of the competitions point scoring. It
will be interesting to see if Freestyle Judo ever reaches these shores.
I've rolled rules back to 1972 for club purposes. I hate what if h had done to judo for no good reason. Most of my new students now are bjjers.
ReplyDeleteI wish judoka would just reject the new rules. They have always been a way to protect judo players from other grappling arts. 100 years ago, judoka took on all comers and won. Now if hides behind rules.
bagses
It seems to me that only when Judoka have stopped competing do they then start to learn the other parts of Judo (Kata & Atemi waza) and all the other techniques which have been banned from IJF competition like leg grabs.It's a real shame but I can understand why.
DeleteAlso to note, the point system REWARDS you for doing Judo skills, turn-overs, sweeps, ect. We all learn this in class but often halted in Shiai from doing newaza skills, reward it and it happens. Freestyle Judo is just plain fun and that alone will attract new Judoka and keep them coming! Kano, founder of Kodokan Judo, not the IJF. Get Free, Freestyle Judo!
ReplyDelete